Luxoft vs Klika Tech: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Klika Tech (4.3/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.9/5) overall. Klika Tech is the better choice for teams needing edge-to-cloud IoT systems with AWS-native integration. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive OEMs needing infotainment and digital cockpit software at DXC scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Luxoft vs Klika Tech: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Luxoft | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2013 |
| HQ | Zug, Switzerland | Lubbock, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 18,000 | 101–250 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology | AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Android Automotive, C/C++ | AWS IoT, Embedded C/C++, Edge AI/ML |
| Industries served | Automotive | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy, Smart home |
Luxoft vs Klika Tech: overview
Luxoft
Luxoft was founded in 2000 and became a well-known automotive software systems integrator before being acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 and now operating as DXC Luxoft. Headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, the company reports an international workforce of nearly 18,000 people across 44 cities and 21 countries, with automotive software — including in-vehicle infotainment platforms like the newly announced AMBER platform — as a named strength; DXC states its automotive software already powers more than 50 million vehicles and that DXC partners with 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers. Embedded/automotive work now sits inside DXC's broader enterprise IT services portfolio following the acquisition.
Klika Tech
Klika Tech was founded in 2013 by Gennadiy Mark Borisov and Val Kamenski and is headquartered in Lubbock, Texas, with locations across North and South America, Europe, and Central Asia and a team of roughly 180 people. The company specializes in cloud computing, IoT, AI/ML, and embedded systems solutions, holding AWS Premier Partner status for delivering IoT, cloud-native, data, and AI/ML solutions across edge-to-cloud platforms, alongside a documented STMicroelectronics partnership. Klika Tech's positioning sits specifically at the intersection of embedded/edge devices and cloud platforms, a narrower and more specific specialization than firms offering embedded work as a generic capability.
Services and capabilities: Luxoft vs Klika Tech
| Capability | Luxoft | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Luxoft vs Klika Tech
| Framework / platform | Luxoft | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | ✓ |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Luxoft vs Klika Tech
| Criterion | Luxoft | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Luxoft vs Klika Tech
| Dimension | Luxoft | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy |
| Best use cases | In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise, OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers | IoT products needing tightly integrated AWS edge-to-cloud pipelines, Edge AI/ML deployments requiring both embedded and cloud-native engineering |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Luxoft vs Klika Tech: pros and cons
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers |
| + | Named in-vehicle infotainment platform (AMBER) demonstrates active investment in digital cockpit software |
| + | Nearly 18,000-person international workforce across 44 cities supports globally distributed OEM programs |
| - | Acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 — automotive/embedded work now sits inside a much larger enterprise IT services company's portfolio |
| - | Automotive-only embedded focus means no relevant track record outside the automotive vertical |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
| Klika Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | AWS Premier Partner status specifically for IoT, cloud-native, and AI/ML edge-to-cloud solutions |
| + | Documented STMicroelectronics partnership supports embedded hardware-adjacent credibility |
| + | Global office footprint (Americas, Europe, Central Asia) at a still-boutique 180-person scale |
| - | Edge-to-cloud/AWS specialization means teams needing platform-agnostic or non-AWS cloud integration should confirm fit directly |
| - | Team size (~180) limits capacity for very large, multi-workstream enterprise programs |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: in-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise.
Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.
Who should choose Klika Tech?
A typical fit: IoT products needing tightly integrated AWS edge-to-cloud pipelines.
AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Luxoft vs Klika Tech
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Luxoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Luxoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Luxoft (Not disclosed) vs Klika Tech (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Klika Tech |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Luxoft |
Use case fit: Luxoft vs Klika Tech
| Use case | Luxoft fit | Klika Tech fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise | Strong | Limited | Luxoft |
| OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers | Strong | Limited | Luxoft |
| IoT products needing tightly integrated AWS edge-to-cloud pipelines | Limited | Strong | Klika Tech |
| Edge AI/ML deployments requiring both embedded and cloud-native engineering | Limited | Strong | Klika Tech |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Luxoft vs Klika Tech
Klika Tech (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software projects. AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership.
Luxoft (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Luxoft vs Klika Tech FAQ
Is Luxoft better than Klika Tech?
Klika Tech (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Luxoft's strongest advantage: automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers. Klika Tech's strongest advantage: AWS Premier Partner status specifically for IoT, cloud-native, and AI/ML edge-to-cloud solutions.
How do Luxoft and Klika Tech differ in pricing?
Luxoft uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Klika Tech uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Luxoft or Klika Tech?
Klika Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Luxoft and Klika Tech?
Luxoft's primary differentiator is: automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. Klika Tech's primary differentiator is: AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership. They also differ in team size (18,000 vs 101–250), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Automotive vs Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.