eInfochips vs Klika Tech: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Klika Tech (4.3/5) edges ahead of eInfochips (4.0/5) overall. Klika Tech is the better choice for teams needing edge-to-cloud IoT systems with AWS-native integration. eInfochips is the stronger option for enterprise clients wanting embedded engineering backed by Arrow's supply chain. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Klika Tech: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2013 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Lubbock, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 101–250 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Component sourcing and supply-chain access via parent company Arrow Electronics, paired with a 30-year product engineering track record | AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux (Yocto), FreeRTOS, C/C++ | AWS IoT, Embedded C/C++, Edge AI/ML |
| Industries served | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy, Smart home |
eInfochips vs Klika Tech: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 in Ahmedabad, India and has grown into a large product engineering and software R&D services company, now operating as an Arrow Electronics company following Arrow's acquisition. The firm reports 500+ product developments and tens of millions of deployments across embedded, semiconductor, cloud, and IoT engineering, with design centers across India, Japan, and the US (engineering HQ in San Jose, California). Being part of Arrow Electronics gives eInfochips direct access to component sourcing and supply-chain relationships that boutique embedded shops don't have, though it also means embedded engineering competes for attention against Arrow's broader distribution and services business.
Klika Tech
Klika Tech was founded in 2013 by Gennadiy Mark Borisov and Val Kamenski and is headquartered in Lubbock, Texas, with locations across North and South America, Europe, and Central Asia and a team of roughly 180 people. The company specializes in cloud computing, IoT, AI/ML, and embedded systems solutions, holding AWS Premier Partner status for delivering IoT, cloud-native, data, and AI/ML solutions across edge-to-cloud platforms, alongside a documented STMicroelectronics partnership. Klika Tech's positioning sits specifically at the intersection of embedded/edge devices and cloud platforms, a narrower and more specific specialization than firms offering embedded work as a generic capability.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Klika Tech
| Capability | eInfochips | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Klika Tech
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Klika Tech
| Criterion | eInfochips | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Klika Tech
| Dimension | eInfochips | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy |
| Best use cases | Consumer electronics programs needing component sourcing alongside firmware, Enterprise IoT deployments requiring both hardware and cloud integration | IoT products needing tightly integrated AWS edge-to-cloud pipelines, Edge AI/ML deployments requiring both embedded and cloud-native engineering |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs Klika Tech: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Acquisition by Arrow Electronics gives direct access to component sourcing and semiconductor supply-chain relationships |
| + | 500+ documented product engineering deliveries over a 30-year history |
| + | Design centers across India, Japan, and the US support round-the-clock delivery coverage |
| + | Broad embedded-to-cloud stack rather than firmware alone |
| - | Acquired by Arrow Electronics — embedded engineering is now one line of business inside a much larger distribution company, which can dilute specialist focus (per company website; independently unverifiable exact reporting structure) |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
| - | Team size estimates vary significantly across sources (1,500 to nearly 4,000), making exact capacity hard to verify |
| Klika Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | AWS Premier Partner status specifically for IoT, cloud-native, and AI/ML edge-to-cloud solutions |
| + | Documented STMicroelectronics partnership supports embedded hardware-adjacent credibility |
| + | Global office footprint (Americas, Europe, Central Asia) at a still-boutique 180-person scale |
| - | Edge-to-cloud/AWS specialization means teams needing platform-agnostic or non-AWS cloud integration should confirm fit directly |
| - | Team size (~180) limits capacity for very large, multi-workstream enterprise programs |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: consumer electronics programs needing component sourcing alongside firmware.
Component sourcing and supply-chain access via parent company Arrow Electronics, paired with a 30-year product engineering track record. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor.
Who should choose Klika Tech?
A typical fit: IoT products needing tightly integrated AWS edge-to-cloud pipelines.
AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy, Smart home.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Klika Tech
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not disclosed) vs Klika Tech (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | eInfochips |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Klika Tech
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Klika Tech fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer electronics programs needing component sourcing alongside firmware | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Enterprise IoT deployments requiring both hardware and cloud integration | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| IoT products needing tightly integrated AWS edge-to-cloud pipelines | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Edge AI/ML deployments requiring both embedded and cloud-native engineering | Limited | Strong | Klika Tech |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Klika Tech
Klika Tech (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software projects. AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership.
eInfochips (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need enterprise IoT deployments requiring both hardware and cloud integration. If your situation matches that, eInfochips is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Klika Tech FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Klika Tech?
Klika Tech (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: acquisition by Arrow Electronics gives direct access to component sourcing and semiconductor supply-chain relationships. Klika Tech's strongest advantage: AWS Premier Partner status specifically for IoT, cloud-native, and AI/ML edge-to-cloud solutions.
How do eInfochips and Klika Tech differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Klika Tech uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Klika Tech?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Klika Tech?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: component sourcing and supply-chain access via parent company Arrow Electronics, paired with a 30-year product engineering track record. Klika Tech's primary differentiator is: AWS Premier Partner specializing specifically in edge-to-cloud IoT integration, backed by a documented STMicroelectronics partnership. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 101–250), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT vs Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.