Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for full-stack embedded builds needing hardware through cloud in one team. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive OEMs needing infotainment and digital cockpit software at DXC scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Zug, Switzerland |
| Team size | 200+ | 18,000 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab | Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux, Android Automotive, C/C++ |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Automotive |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is an embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. The 200+ person team covers electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, embedded GUI development, connectivity and IoT, edge AI, and cybersecurity, and positions itself around "360° engineering expertise" spanning Embedded, Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital domains rather than embedded work in isolation. The company holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications and works with semiconductor partners including NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics as primary partners, alongside Texas Instruments, Nordic Semiconductor, Renesas, and others. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and all intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery.
Luxoft
Luxoft was founded in 2000 and became a well-known automotive software systems integrator before being acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 and now operating as DXC Luxoft. Headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, the company reports an international workforce of nearly 18,000 people across 44 cities and 21 countries, with automotive software — including in-vehicle infotainment platforms like the newly announced AMBER platform — as a named strength; DXC states its automotive software already powers more than 50 million vehicles and that DXC partners with 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers. Embedded/automotive work now sits inside DXC's broader enterprise IT services portfolio following the acquisition.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Automotive |
| Best use cases | EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software, Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise, OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications support regulated-industry work in medical, energy, and automotive |
| + | Named semiconductor partnerships with NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics plus a documented in-house hardware lab for board bring-up |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies spanning EV charging (OCPP), 3D bioprinting, and medical device firmware ported to STM32 |
| - | Does not handle mass production in-house — supports development and ongoing maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Does not obtain product regulatory certification on the client's behalf — provides technical documentation and engineering support, but the client or a third party owns the certification process |
| - | Pricing is not published; engagement scope and cost require a direct discovery call |
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers |
| + | Named in-vehicle infotainment platform (AMBER) demonstrates active investment in digital cockpit software |
| + | Nearly 18,000-person international workforce across 44 cities supports globally distributed OEM programs |
| - | Acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 — automotive/embedded work now sits inside a much larger enterprise IT services company's portfolio |
| - | Automotive-only embedded focus means no relevant track record outside the automotive vertical |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software.
360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: in-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise.
Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Luxoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Luxoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Luxoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Luxoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software projects. 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab.
Luxoft (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof. Luxoft's strongest advantage: automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Luxoft uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Luxoft?
Luxoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Luxoft's primary differentiator is: automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 18,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.