Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Capgemini Engineering (3.8/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for full-stack embedded builds needing hardware through cloud in one team. Capgemini Engineering is the stronger option for global enterprises needing embedded work inside a broad engineering consultancy. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1982 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Neuilly-sur-Seine, France |
| Team size | 200+ | 45,000+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab | One of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux, C/C++, AUTOSAR |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Automotive, Aerospace, Energy, Life sciences, Telecom |
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is an embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. The 200+ person team covers electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, embedded GUI development, connectivity and IoT, edge AI, and cybersecurity, and positions itself around "360° engineering expertise" spanning Embedded, Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital domains rather than embedded work in isolation. The company holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications and works with semiconductor partners including NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics as primary partners, alongside Texas Instruments, Nordic Semiconductor, Renesas, and others. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and all intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery.
Capgemini Engineering
Capgemini Engineering traces its roots to Altran Technologies, founded in 1982 in France by Alexis Kniazeff and Hubert Martigny, which grew into a major engineering and R&D consultancy before Capgemini acquired it in 2019 and rebranded the combined engineering business as Capgemini Engineering in 2021. Headquartered in the Paris region (Neuilly-sur-Seine), the firm now employs somewhere between roughly 45,000 and 52,000 people worldwide depending on the source, with electronics and embedded engineering representing one technical domain within an extremely broad engineering-and-innovation consulting portfolio spanning nearly every industry.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Automotive, Aerospace, Energy |
| Best use cases | EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software, Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | Very large multi-domain engineering programs where embedded is one workstream among several, Global enterprise clients wanting a single engineering vendor across mechanical, embedded, and cloud |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications support regulated-industry work in medical, energy, and automotive |
| + | Named semiconductor partnerships with NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics plus a documented in-house hardware lab for board bring-up |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies spanning EV charging (OCPP), 3D bioprinting, and medical device firmware ported to STM32 |
| - | Does not handle mass production in-house — supports development and ongoing maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Does not obtain product regulatory certification on the client's behalf — provides technical documentation and engineering support, but the client or a third party owns the certification process |
| - | Pricing is not published; engagement scope and cost require a direct discovery call |
| Capgemini Engineering | |
|---|---|
| + | Extremely large global scale (45,000+ engineers) can absorb programs no boutique or mid-size firm could staff alone |
| + | Broad engineering domains beyond embedded (mechanical, systems, cloud) available under one contract for complex products |
| + | 40+ year engineering consulting heritage predating the 2019 Capgemini acquisition and 2021 rebrand |
| - | Acquired by Capgemini in 2019 and renamed from Altran in 2021 — buyers should confirm which legacy Altran teams and processes remain intact post-rebrand |
| - | Embedded/electronics engineering is one technical domain within an extremely broad portfolio, not a dedicated specialization |
| - | Scale and process overhead of a firm this size is a poor fit for small, fast-moving embedded projects |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software.
360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Capgemini Engineering?
A typical fit: very large multi-domain engineering programs where embedded is one workstream among several.
One of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Aerospace, Energy, Life sciences, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Capgemini Engineering |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Capgemini Engineering |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Capgemini Engineering (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Capgemini Engineering fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Very large multi-domain engineering programs where embedded is one workstream among several | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| Global enterprise clients wanting a single engineering vendor across mechanical, embedded, and cloud | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software projects. 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab.
Capgemini Engineering (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need global enterprise clients wanting a single engineering vendor across mechanical, embedded, and cloud. If your situation matches that, Capgemini Engineering is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Capgemini Engineering?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof. Capgemini Engineering's strongest advantage: extremely large global scale (45,000+ engineers) can absorb programs no boutique or mid-size firm could staff alone.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Capgemini Engineering differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Capgemini Engineering uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Capgemini Engineering?
Capgemini Engineering is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Capgemini Engineering?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Capgemini Engineering's primary differentiator is: one of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 45,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Automotive, Aerospace).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.