Integra Sources vs Data Respons: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Data Respons (4.2/5) edges ahead of Integra Sources (4.1/5) overall. Data Respons is the better choice for nordic and European clients needing embedded work across multiple regulated sectors. Integra Sources is the stronger option for startups wanting one team for both hardware and firmware on a small budget. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Integra Sources vs Data Respons: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 1986 |
| HQ | Astana, Kazakhstan | Høvik, Norway |
| Team size | 11–50 | 1,400 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Turnkey hardware-plus-firmware delivery from a single small team, avoiding the coordination overhead of separate vendors | Nordic embedded specialist with nearly 40 years of history across eight distinct industry sectors, now backed by Akkodis' scale |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Embedded Linux | Embedded Linux, C/C++, RTOS |
| Industries served | Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT, Medical devices | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security |
Integra Sources vs Data Respons: overview
Integra Sources
Integra Sources is a custom hardware design and software development company founded in 2014, offering electronic design, embedded firmware, kernel/driver development, and full-stack product development from a single team. Public sources disagree on exact headquarters (Astana, Kazakhstan per most directories) and current headcount (estimates range from roughly 24 to 51 employees), which is typical for a boutique of this size. The company markets itself on "turnkey product development" — hardware and software delivered by one company rather than coordinating separate vendors — and reports 250+ completed IoT and embedded projects.
Data Respons
Data Respons was founded in 1986 and is headquartered in Høvik, Norway, developing embedded systems across transport & automotive, telecom & media, industrial automation, energy & maritime, medtech, space, defense & security, and finance & public sectors, with offices in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Taiwan and roughly 1,400 employees. AKKA Technologies acquired Data Respons through a compulsory share acquisition completed in May 2020, delisting it from the Oslo Stock Exchange; AKKA itself was subsequently folded into Akkodis (part of the Adecco Group). Data Respons retains a genuinely embedded-focused practice despite the ownership changes, distinguishing it from broader generalist consultancies that added embedded as a side practice.
Services and capabilities: Integra Sources vs Data Respons
| Capability | Integra Sources | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✗ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Integra Sources vs Data Respons
| Framework / platform | Integra Sources | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Bluetooth | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Integra Sources vs Data Respons
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Integra Sources vs Data Respons
| Dimension | Integra Sources | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime |
| Best use cases | Hardware startups needing PCB design and firmware from one small vendor, MVP and prototype development for connected consumer devices | Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity, Medtech products requiring embedded engineering across a multi-sector specialist team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Integra Sources vs Data Respons: pros and cons
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | One team handles electronic design, PCB layout, FPGA, and embedded firmware without subcontracting hardware separately |
| + | 250+ completed projects reported despite a small team size |
| + | Low overhead structure suits early-stage hardware startups on tight budgets |
| - | Public sources disagree on both headquarters location and headcount, making capacity hard to verify precisely (per company website and third-party directories; independently unverifiable) |
| - | Small team size limits capacity for large, multi-workstream programs compared to mid-size or enterprise firms |
| - | No public case studies with named enterprise clients |
| Data Respons | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense |
| + | Nordic regional presence (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) plus Germany and Taiwan offices supports European and APAC delivery |
| + | Now backed by Akkodis (Adecco Group) scale while retaining a genuinely embedded-focused delivery team |
| - | Acquired by AKKA Technologies in 2020 (delisted from Oslo Stock Exchange) and subsequently folded into Akkodis — buyers should confirm which legacy Data Respons teams and processes remain intact |
| - | 1,400-employee scale sits below the largest global engineering firms for very large concurrent programs |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: hardware startups needing PCB design and firmware from one small vendor.
Turnkey hardware-plus-firmware delivery from a single small team, avoiding the coordination overhead of separate vendors. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT, Medical devices.
Who should choose Data Respons?
A typical fit: maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity.
Nordic embedded specialist with nearly 40 years of history across eight distinct industry sectors, now backed by Akkodis' scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security.
Decision matrix: Integra Sources vs Data Respons
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integra Sources |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Data Respons |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Integra Sources (Not disclosed) vs Data Respons (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Data Respons |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Integra Sources |
Use case fit: Integra Sources vs Data Respons
| Use case | Integra Sources fit | Data Respons fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware startups needing PCB design and firmware from one small vendor | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| MVP and prototype development for connected consumer devices | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity | Limited | Strong | Data Respons |
| Medtech products requiring embedded engineering across a multi-sector specialist team | Limited | Strong | Data Respons |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Integra Sources vs Data Respons
Data Respons (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software projects. Nordic embedded specialist with nearly 40 years of history across eight distinct industry sectors, now backed by Akkodis' scale.
Integra Sources (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need MVP and prototype development for connected consumer devices. If your situation matches that, Integra Sources is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Integra Sources vs Data Respons FAQ
Is Integra Sources better than Data Respons?
Data Respons (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: one team handles electronic design, PCB layout, FPGA, and embedded firmware without subcontracting hardware separately. Data Respons's strongest advantage: nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense.
How do Integra Sources and Data Respons differ in pricing?
Integra Sources uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Data Respons uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Integra Sources or Data Respons?
Data Respons is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Integra Sources and Data Respons?
Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: turnkey hardware-plus-firmware delivery from a single small team, avoiding the coordination overhead of separate vendors. Data Respons's primary differentiator is: nordic embedded specialist with nearly 40 years of history across eight distinct industry sectors, now backed by Akkodis' scale. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 1,400), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Consumer Electronics, Robotics vs Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.